For those unaware, the proposals can be found here on the wiki.
I’m happy enough with CAPs: 1, 4A, 6, 7, 8, 10
I am against the following CAPs: 2, 3, 4B, 12, 13, 14
I am indifferent to: 5, 9, 11
I’ll go through my reasons for the against.
The National Council is quite literally comprised of those persons formally elected, to the exclusion of all others. Composed is a spurious and unnecessary change.
The Party Agent has since at least the last Congress been defined as a responsibility of the Registered Officer, so this proposal doesn’t solve whatever problem you have identified (there is no rationale listed).
I support 4A, mostly because 4B is ambiguous and breaks more than it fixes.
No. Just no. I don’t like it on any level. It’s something one might find in the Liberal Democratic Party constitution, not ours.
This proposal as written isn’t sufficient to be considered a valid motion in my opinion, but I’ve written a formal amendment proposal and it’s on the wiki as “CAP-13 Amendment A”.
I don’t think it’s an appropriate amendment to simply decide that only Full Members are restricted to single party membership, and leave all other membership levels completely outside the scope of those provisions.
I have already discussed the model I would have preferred and my reasoning, and this goes in a direction I do not approve of.