Liquid Democracy as a solution for decision making in a political party turns out to be too superficial for purpose.
Simple popularity is not a good basis for decision making.
It needs to go a lot deeper, understanding core values, evaluating evidence, open transparent debate etc.
Liquid Democracy does not provide these things.
Nice name though.
My only suggestion is to change âsea-grassrootsâ to âseagrass-rootsâ as it flows a little better and when punning you use the replacement word as the joke ie âIsabel really necessary on a bikeâ not âIs-a-bell really necessary on a bikeâ
Also: we have an Identity Style Guide - letâs follow it.
It would also be helpful to use CC or public-domain images and explicitly say that.
Anyway, hereâs what I think the seagrass-roots one might look like in that context.
Something I did a couple of years ago for a facebook banner (hence the nothingness in the bottom left):
Itâs a bit of a mess and needs a good rework, but I think itâs got potential.
Edit to add: @edeity you make a good point about the poster-meme distinction. Now this, this is a meme:
I suggest that you switch the position of the pics around on reef one so that #VotePirate isnât sitting on top of bleached coral.
Couple more suggestions:
- Who are you going to trust, a Politician or a Pirate?
- Thinking democracy, thinking sharing the wealth⌠Think Politician (strikethrough text) Pirate
For the Ex Democrats
- You know youâre in trouble when itâs up to a Pirate to keep the bastards honest
- Its going to take a shipload of Pirates to keep these bastards honest
*etc
Re-purposing ⌠just like a Pirate. I like it.
Perhaps âKeep the Bastards Honest, with a Shipload of Piratesâ?
edit: or "Pirates! Keeping the Bastards Honest"
edit again: âKeep the Bastards Honest. Become a Pirate!â
@edeity, I appreciate your answer here about social media âstrategyâ. Thank you.
Images are important.
A few snipped bits âŚ
When youâre browsing Netflix, if your attention isnât grabbed by a program within 90 seconds, youâre statistically likely to do something else instead.
You need to figure out a way to tell the story of the program in a single image.
Neuroscientists have discovered that the human brain can process an image in as little as 13 milliseconds,
Netflix set out to develop âa data driven frameworkâ through which it can find the best artwork for each video
Itâs well known that humans are hardwired to respond to faces. But it is important to note that faces with complex emotions outperform stoic or benign expressions â seeing a range of emotions actually compels people to watch a story more.
Great stories travel, but regional nuances can be powerful
Viewers respond to villainous characters surprisingly well
an imageâs tendency to win dramatically dropped when it contained more than 3 people
This is different to the purpose of a meme. The difference is important because its about picking the right tool for the job - hence links back to strategy (the actual strategy bit - i.e. the why, not the how). Its the meme vs. advertisement discussion.
A meme is basically a self replicating piece of information. It does this by triggering a response in the human viewing / reading it to make them propogate it to other people. This is the basis of something âgoing viralâ. It can be counterintuitive but memes often work well when they donât make sense or use a range of âinnapropriateâ emotion - it creates an in/out group dynamic that makes âgettingâ the meme aspirational.
Memes are bad for educating and spreading large amounts of structured information, good for creating highly engaged groups of people that will then self educate and promote independently of centralised control.
Designing memes is an actual science. You can certainly get a lot of success in creating something that can spread just by emulating other memes that were successful, but to achieve a specific outcome within a timeframe can require actual design.
A lot of the original reference material for this predates people publishing things on the internet openly, but Dawkins for the basics (although most people are across his definitions of memes) and for more specifics on engineering memes I have tended to follow Blackmoores views, although she has since moved firmly into the territory of post human AI memes (memes that engineer memes) - which whilst highly probable do not help right here right now designing memes to get people to get other people to vote Pirate.
If anyone cares about this stuff, I can dig around and see what I can find for the reference material.
I liked this version of the phrase the best, so I made it.
Also, Iâm blatantly breaking the style guide here, by not having the logo on an approved monochromatic background. There is however a drop shadow to aid in legibility. Flame shield has been raised in anticipation. Pinging @Frew and @Feenicks to weigh in on this one.
edit: @edeity this thing isnât even close to viable levels of virality, is it.
It doesnât have to be âtechnicallyâ a meme to go viral and it doesnât even have to go full blown viral.
It just has to be memorable, relateable and shareable, which I think this image achieves
these
8 hours later, this phrasing seems dangerously close to self-referential.
Little bit. I suspect Don got it right the first time.
It plays merry hell with the line length, though. Had to switch to centred text.
Other changes: made the ship a bit transparent. I think it looks a bit better, opinions may vary.
I didnât think self referential. I thought âthese bastardsâ as distinct from âthe bastardsâ of yesteryear ie Pirates are required where once Democrats were sufficient.
Also, it refers to pirates and bastards and the image includes a pirate ship and parliament - itâs logical which refers to which.
I like it anyway but particularly version 1.
Of course probably cant actually use this officially⌠copyright etc.
But it shows an example of the replicability - hooks: emotional immediacy, australia relevance, impending doom, sense of fears being ignored. Compels viewer to be a hero and do something. Trigger discussion and sharing of meme.
I think is clear enough that we mean âTheâ bastards in Parliament house honest, which in a very simple way is what the senate is supposed to do.
Also âthe bastardsâ is already lodged in everyoneâs mind as related to the Dems, so it needs to be slightly different so people think of us.
@edeity your mad max meme certainly works and I like it, but only the more dedicated netizen will understand the combination of references or even be aware of the issues you are raising.
The average internet userâs concern with online privacy is basically not having their mum/gf knowing about the porn they watch.
People who are aware of their online footprint tend to understand why data collection isnât in their best interest.
How do you make a meme to explain it to people who; 1) donât realise they leave traceable footprints online, and 2) donât know what a meme is?
A lot of people are worried about personal data. Does my boss need to know I went to the doctors? That Iâm pregnant? That I have an STD? That Iâm an atheist? American companies have been asking people in interviews to log into their social media⌠itâs not illegal if they agreeâŚ
The general public is not as oblivious as we sometimes assume.
Point of a meme is that you do not need to know what one is. Unless your meme is focused on an ingroup of meme consumers (which tbh this one is partly⌠so not ideal for a general population meme)
Flip side - you need to realise your not going to be interesting to everyone, so instead be really interesting to the ones you want.