I think, and I hope this comes off respectfully, that many of the proposed names are equally as narrow as Pirate Party. I am perfectly happy to stay with Pirate Party if all the suggestions are merely restatements of the same or similar narrow concepts. Renaming was floated, as I understood, to move us away from the perception that we are a ‘niche’ or single-issue party. As @bug1 pointed out:
I would also suggest we pick a name that represents our ideology in some way. That is, words that reflect what we want to actually do. We should avoid names like ‘Australian Screen Association’, which is actually a copyright lobby for the film industry and used to be called the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (commonly known as AFACT) or ‘Creative Content Australia’, which is the rebranded Intellectual Property Awareness Foundation.
Note that the former names of these organisations reflected what they were about ideologically and what their purpose was. It’s hard to unpack what the true purpose of those organisations is now.
Pirate Party is quite an honest name for what we are still partly about, but doesn’t entirely cover our entire ideology and policies.