By the contrary, there are plenty of extraordinary evidence.
The fact that the West didnât bother to attack the oil wells of ISIS is absolutely extraordinary. The same with ISISâs trucks transporting oil (except once), and the roads used by the said trucks. It is also extraordinary that the West didnât bother to find the buyers and suppliers of ISIS (who is selling goods like clothes, cars, construction materials, trucks to ISIS?)
The fact that the US government refuses to engage the best specialists in ISIS in order to make a plan for eradicating the group is also extraordinary. Itâs not me saying that, itâs Michael Weiss (Daily Beast senior editor): link
There is no U.S. policy to defeat ISIS. Why? Because Barack Obama is very tired. He doesnât care.
There is a real problem in the way the United States is going about this.
There are lots of people who know exactly what they are doing and know exactly how this organization works, and not a single one of them, so far as I can tell, has been invited to be part of any special task force on countering ISIS.
Itâs also extraordinary that the West, who claims to promote democracy and human rights all over the world, supports brutal dictators: - link
(1958) President Eisenhower, in an internal discussion, observed to his staff, and Iâm quoting now, âThereâs a campaign of hatred against us in the Middle East, not by governments, but by the people.â The National Security Council discussed that question and said, yes, and the reason is, thereâs a perception in that region that the United States supports status quo governments, which prevent democracy and development and that we do it because of our interests in Middle East oil. Furthermore, itâs difficult to counter that perception because itâs correct. It ought to be correct. We ought to be supporting brutal and corrupt governments which prevent democracy and development because we want to control Middle East oil, and itâs true that leads to a campaign of hatred against us.
and in 1991: (sorry only 2 links allowed)
The rebelling forces in March 1991 were an alternative, but the US preferred Saddam. There was an Iraqi democratic opposition in exile. Washington refused to have anything to do with them before, during, or after the Gulf War, and they were virtually excluded from the US media, apart from marginal dissident journals. âPolitical meetings with them would not be appropriate for our policy at this time,â State Department spokesman Richard Boucher stated on March 14, 1991, while Saddam was decimating the opposition under the eyes of Storminâ Norman Schwartzkopf. They still exist. How realistic their programs are, I cannot judge, and I do not think we can know as long as the US remains committed â as apparently it still is â to the Bush adminstration policy that preferred âan iron-fisted Iraqi junta,â without Saddam Hussein if possible, a return to the days when Saddamâs âiron fistâŚheld Iraq together, much to the satisfaction of the American allies Turkey and Saudi Arabia,â
It is also extraordinary that, while spending more than one trillion $US dollars on the war in Iraq, the US did absolutely nothing to reduce the corruption in Iraq. By the contrary, they prefer dubious people in power in Iraq.
With a small tiny fraction of those money wasted, the US could pay some insiders in the Iraq government in order to expose the corruption and to pressure the Iraq government to put clean people in charge of the countryâs affairs. The US has a formidable power to pressure Iraq yet it is not using it at all, which is absolutely extraordinary.
The corruption in Iraq played a huge role into the expansion of ISIS and it still does. And the US is doing absolutely nothing about that.