Great news that the goal was met so quickly, but it’s unfortunate that these kind of campaigns are even necessary. Even setting aside personal opinion (and party policy) that publically funded software projects should be open source, surely something as crucial as vote counting software should be available to scrutiny by all - not just a single contracted company.
Can you imagine the uproar if this FOI works, access is gained, and it is found to have some kind of fundamental flaw that changes election outcomes… oh man.
They have consistently released database dumps of the election ballots, GVTs, etc, so one can code their own implementation of STV and verify the results.
Even in the crappy implementations I’ve written over the years, the results are always pretty consistent.
Please note I am very carefully not saying what I actually think about this, although you may be reading into the matter pretty much precisely what I do think about it.
To validate the election results you don’t need the software, just the raw input data; if you can generate the same result, then their software must be at least mostly correct.