Current Policy is FTTP-only for the National Broadband Network:
Support for fibre-to-the-premises infrastructure projects
The current copper network is not sufficient to meet the requirements of a growing digital society. A fibre-to-the-premises infrastructure project that connects the majority of Australians to a fibre network, where economically feasible, is fundamental to the creation of a vibrant digital society in Australia."
I think it is very scant and outdated for 2016. I know this is an issue close to our hearts as digital pioneers.
FTTdp (Fibre-To-The-distribution-point)
Recently there has been a lot of noise about FTTdp. I know that FTTdp is just another fancy term that has recently come up, but I believe that FTTdp is a feasible cost-saving alternative which does not impede upgrading to a fully fledged GPON FTTP for a reasonable cost.
Here is a good doc which explains it well: http://telsoc.org/ajtde/2014-03-v2-n1/a26
In a nutshell:
FTTdp means is that Fibre-optics are run down the street in exactly the same way as a fully-fledged Fibre-To-The-Premises. It is compatible with and upgradeable to FTTP at any point in the future. The difference is that it stops short of actually entering each individual premises, where it uses the existing copper from there instead.
Entering each and every premises is extremely costly, time-consuming activity because every property is different (eg: Installation challenges, Owners, body corporate, etc.). It is a major obstacle when whole point of NBN is to provide universal access, and if not everyone gets onto the network then potential revenue needed to help recover the cost of it is missed.
Policy Proposal
I would support FTTPdp subject to the following conditions:
- FTTP Upgrades available to everyone on the FTTdp network, at any time, if they are willing to pay for it.
- Surveys sent out to all properties before design phase, to gauge interest of who will take up an NBN service first, and who will be skipping straight to a FTTP upgrade
- FTTP Upgrades will be possible in two ways.
Option A:
NBNCo provides full installation of Fibre Lead-In (at a highly marked up cost to help fill the coffers)
Option B:
NBNCo provides the lead in up to the property boundary with a pre-spliced Fibre run, and then it is up to the property owner to hire a Licensed cabler to complete the rest. Doing their own trenching (according to appropriate safety regulations and 0011 Dial before you dig) is also permitted to reduce cost. This is the most cost-effective market-based approach to install a lead in, as installers are marketing directly to the customer, it’s the customers’ responsibility to organise it, and installers can customise it to the customers requirements and add other value-add services (i.e. setup home entertainment, computers, Wi-Fi, LAN network points across the building, etc.) - Those who skip straight to FTTP get a small discount (Maybe equivalent to Option B?) to reflect the cost savings of not having to install a FTTdp micronode port for them, and to encourage owners take on some of the cost.
- FTTdp Micro-nodes are to be Reverse-power feeding (RPF)-only so that new lines for power do not need to be run to the Pit (If this means that even customers who have upgraded to FTTP will be required to keep their copper line so that they can help feed power for their neighbours too, then so be it.)
FTTP and FTTdp
Policy Proposal
- Default to NO to an NBN Backup Battery
- Charge Extra to get one, unless there is a medical condition involved.
NBN Backup batteries are a huge environmental and monetary waste. They add install time.
Even if you have them, the number of hours it provides backup for is limited to only a short time (because FTTP/FTTdp is too power hungry for the batteries to handle).
At the end of the Batteries useful life (about 2 years) they need to be disposed of and replaced. They use valuable metals inside which would be better put towards other purposes.
A far better backup solution would be to have a 3G/4G module in the customer’s phone/internet which acts the same as a mobile phone instead.
If an emergency call is required while the NBN is down, the module (which is backed by a small mobile phone battery) can make phone calls like a regular mobile phone would, or access the internet over 3G or 4G. Basic services to allow 000 calls will be free, but the customer or the RSP will have the option of adding a SIM card to provide extra redundancy for those who want it.
Telephone-only customers and very low internet usage customers
It’s an absolute waste to install broadband services in such a case when commercial 3G and 4G networks are more than capable of handling voice-only and low bandwidth traffic.
Policy Proposal
- Adapters that convert PSTN handsets/alarms to send/receive their calls using regular 3G phone calls should become more common. ACMA should allow local number porting (eg: (03) 9999 9999) onto a mobile service (obviously cost of a local call for a caller to such a number)
- Mobile Phone providers can make up their own pricing scheme to market conditions