OK, on the document you have provided, I can see the graph from your post 28 of this thread. However, I cannot see the figures in post 21, with the reference at the bottom “Source : Open El, Lazard, Nucleus Wealth Estimates”.
That was the table with figures for “utility solar”, “utility solar+partial battery”, “utility solar+full battery” and “nuclear”, with the fact that “utility solar” was separated out from the battery variants suggesting that the levelised cost for “utility solar” was in fact for solar without batteries, and so really Nuclear should have been compared to the utility solar+full battery. That would in fact reflect my understanding of what “utility solar” means - in fact, something that seems the case in the report from the CO2CRC report you referenced.
Further, I observe that both of the tables in your list of 21 are for future projected costs, and do not allow of the possibility of next-general nuclear power plants having a cheaper electric costs in the future. Further, we don’t know what year the figures in your list were calculated.
So, what is the reference to your list in post 21, from “Open El, Lazard, Nucleus Wealth Estimates” ?